Nivelmap
EN

Umpqua River near Elkton water level

River gauge, Umpqua River, Oregon, United States

Directions

Right now

Below flood stage

Water level

2.89ft Steady over the last 24 hours

Flow
993 cfs
Water temperature
58 °F
0 25 50 Highest onrecord 51.95 ft Minor floodstage 33.00 ft

History

History
2.82.9ftOct 16Oct 19Oct 22Oct 26Oct 292.82.9ftOct 16Oct 22Oct 29
Water level Forecast Minor flood stage

The forecast expects the river to fall to 2.73 ft by Wednesday, October 28 at 05:00 PM. Issued Monday, October 19 at 09:10 AM by NOAA National Weather Service.

What this means

The gauge at Umpqua River near Elkton reads 2.89 ft, a normal level.

It is 30.11 ft below the flood stage of 33.00 ft.

It has barely moved over the past 24 hours. The forecast expects the river to fall to 2.73 ft by Wednesday, October 28 at 05:00 PM. Over the past 30 days it has moved between 2.85 ft and 2.90 ft.

The water temperature at the gauge is 58 °F.

Judged against the official flood stage for this gauge. How to read levels

Key numbers

Highest on record
51.95 ftDecember 23, 1964
Forecast peak
2.91 ftSunday, October 25 at 11:00 PM

What the stage means on the water

A normal level is usually prime time for floating and wade fishing, as long as the weather holds upstream.

The National Weather Service puts flood stage for this gauge at 33.00 ft, still 30.11 ft away.

What happens at each level

49.00 ft
Significant flooding will impact the entire reach of the Umpqua River upstream of Elkton to Reedsport. Expect flooding of school roads, homes, and businesses in the lower sections of the town of Elkton near the Umpqua River. Extensive flooding in Scottsburg can also be expected in the lower sections of town near the Umpqua River. Flooding can also be expected in the town of Reedsport especially if the dike is topped or fails.
44.00 ft
Widespread flooding along the Umpqua River from Kellogg and Elkton to Reedsport can be expected. Flooding of roads homes and businesses in low-lying areas along and near the Umpqua River from Elkton to the mouth at Reedsport is likely. Road soil and river erosion can also be expected. Flooding is likely in the town of Reedsport during high tide in some areas.
40.00 ft
Homes and businesses along and near the Umpqua River near Scottsburg begin to flood. Widespread low-land and agricultural flooding can be expected from Kellogg through Elkton to Scottsburg.
35.00 ft
The Umpqua River is at flood stage. Expect low-land and agricultural flooding from the Kellogg area through Elkton to Scottsburg.
33.00 ft
Slight low-land and agricultural flooding occurs mainly from the Kellogg area through Elkton to Scottsburg.
2.89 ft
Right now

Impact statements from the U.S. National Weather Service.

Highest crests on record

RankLevelDate
151.95 ftDecember 23, 1964
245.60 ftDecember 22, 1955
344.20 ftOctober 30, 1950
444.20 ftJanuary 16, 1974
543.63 ftJanuary 18, 1971
643.00 ftJanuary 19, 1953
742.40 ftNovember 23, 1953
842.20 ftNovember 19, 1996
940.10 ftNovember 23, 1961
1040.00 ftDecember 26, 1955

Weather at the gauge

No rain in the last 3 days.

18 Sun 67° 44° – Wind 7 mph
19 Mon 67° 48° – Wind 11 mph
20 Tue 75° 47° – Wind 5 mph
21 Wed 77° 45° – Wind 6 mph
22 Thu 65° 44° – Wind 9 mph
23 Fri 63° 40° – Wind 8 mph
24 Sat 71° 36° – Wind 3 mph

Forecast: Open-Meteo

Sunrise 07:34 AM Sunset 06:26 PM Daylight 10 hr, 52 min First quarter 61%

Map

Nearby gauges

Gauge Level Compared with normal 24 hours Distance
Little Wolf Creek near TyeeRiver gauge, Little Wolf Creek 0.4 cfs Normal ±0 11 mi
North Umpqua River at WinchesterRiver gauge, North Umpqua River 1.78 ft Below flood stage +0.03 ft 23 mi
Coast Fork Willamette at LondonRiver gauge, Coast Fork Willamette 8.6 cfs Very low +0.3 cfs 24 mi
Coast Fork Willamette River below Cottage Grove DamRiver gauge, Coast Fork Willamette River 113 cfs Low −2.0 cfs 27 mi
Row River near Cottage GroveRiver gauge, Row River 553 cfs Normal −5.0 cfs 32 mi
South Umpqua River near BrockwayRiver gauge, South Umpqua River 2.98 ft Below flood stage −0.02 ft 32 mi
Long Tom River near NotiRiver gauge, Long Tom River 14.3 cfs Low −0.4 cfs 33 mi
Rock Creek near GlideRiver gauge, Rock Creek 14.7 cfs Very low +0.7 cfs 33 mi

Questions and answers

What is flood stage for the Umpqua River near Elkton?

The official flood stage is 33.00 ft. The level is currently 30.11 ft below it.

Is gage height the same as water depth?

No. Gage height is measured from a fixed reference point chosen by the agency, so a reading of 10 ft does not mean the river is 10 ft deep.

What is the water level of Umpqua River near Elkton today?

On Oct 19, 2026, 09:15 AM PDT, the water level was 2.89 ft. Steady over the last 24 hours.

Is Umpqua River near Elkton rising or falling?

Steady over the last 24 hours.

Is the level of Umpqua River near Elkton normal?

Below flood stage. Judged against the official flood stage for this gauge.

What is the highest water level ever recorded at Umpqua River near Elkton?

The highest level on record is 51.95 ft on December 23, 1964.

Is Umpqua River near Elkton expected to rise?

The forecast expects the river to fall to 2.73 ft by Wednesday, October 28 at 05:00 PM.

For specialists

Station codes, datum, parameters, data quality and downloads
Operator
U.S. Geological Survey
Station code
usgs:14321000 (Agency page)
Coordinates
43.58595, -123.55537 (WGS84)
Vertical datum
NGVD29
Update interval
every 15 minutes
Licence
Public domain. Data: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), provisional data subject to revision

Published series

ParameterLast valueTime (UTC)Quality
Water level 2.89 ft 2026-10-19 16:15 Provisional
Flow 993 cfs 2026-10-19 16:15 Provisional
Water temperature 58 °F 2026-10-19 16:15 Provisional

Download

Embed this gauge

Add a live card for this gauge to your website. It updates on its own and links back here.

How to cite

U.S. Geological Survey: Umpqua River near Elkton (usgs:14321000). Accessed October 19, 2026 via Nivelmap, https://nivelmap.com/en/united-states/oregon/umpqua-river-near-elkton

How we check values

Each reading is stored as published. We hold back values that jump faster than physically plausible and show the measurement time with every value.